Human Rights in Chechnya

Reports selected and ordered by time of appearance

Destruction in Chechnya
(Photo by Laurent Van der Stockt)




Other Reports

12 May 2006

Unofficial Places of Detention
in the Chechen Republic

 
International Helsinki Federation

March 2006

The Chechen Republic:
 Consequences of “Chechenization” of the conflict
 

Memorial


21 December 2005

Human rights violations in the Chechen Republic:
the Committee of Ministers’ responsibility vis-à-vis the Assembly’s concerns
 


Parliamentary Assembly
Council of Europe
25 November 2005 Chechnya Parliamentary Elections in a Climate of Fear International Federation for Human Rights
September 2005
A Conveyer of Violence - Human rights violations during anti-terrorist operations in the Republic of Ingushetia
 

Memorial


1 July 2005

Russian Federation: Violations continue, no justice in sight.

A briefing paper on human rights violations in the context of the armed conflict in the Chechen Republic

 


Amnesty Interantional
May 19, 2005
Impunity: A Leading Force behind Continued Massive Violations in Chechnya
International Helsinki Federation
 
March 30, 2005

Chechnya: More of the Same Extrajudicial Killings, Enforced 'Disappearances', Illegal Arrests, Torture


International Helsinki Federation

March 2005

Worse Than a War
“Disappearances” in Chechnya - a Crime Against Humanity


Human Rights Watch



March 17, 2005

Chechnya 2004: “New” Methods of Anti-Terror.
Hostage taking and repressive actions against relatives of alleged combatants and terrorists



Memorial



September 17-20, 2004



Parliamentary Assembly
Council of Europe
 
September 16, 2004

Chechnya's suicide Bombers: Desperate, Devout, or Deceived?

American Committee for
Peace in Chechnya

August, 2004

The Trauma of ongoing War in Chechnya


Doctors without Borders
August 4, 2004
International Helsinki Federation
June 25, 2004
Amnesty Interantional
February 25, 2004
U.S. Department of State
October 2003
Amnesty Interantional
September 2003
Human Rights Watch
Updated on May 2003
Memorial
April 7, 2003
Human Rights Watch
March 13, 2003
Parliamentary Assembly
Council of Europe
February 2003
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
January 2003
Human Rights Watch
January 2003
Caucasus Foundation
2003
Amnesty International
May 2002
Caucasus Foundation
April 2002
Human Rights Watch
March 2002
International Federation for Human Rights
March 18, 2002
Human Rights Watch
February 2002
Human Rights Watch
January 2002
Doctors without Borders
May 2001
Human Rights Watch
March 2001
Human Rights Watch
February 9, 2001
Human Rights Watch
January 23, 2001
Physicians for Human Rights
October 2000
Human Rights Watch
December 1999
Amnesty International
18 November 1999
Society for Threatened Peoples
1997
Memorial
1995
Memorial

Update of events
BBC, Human Rights Watch, press releases.
Past events
Various sources




Unofficial Places of Detention in the Chechen Republic

Background Information Memorandum to Dick Marty, rapporteur of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on alleged secret detention centres in Council of Europe member states

International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF)

12 May 2006

Executive Summary

At the beginning of the second Chechen war, numerous unofficial places of detention existed throughout Chechnya, many of them in the form of earth pits. The biggest such facility was located on the territory of the headquarters of the federal army in Khankala, close to Grozny. The existence of these unofficial places of detention was denied at the time. Later, in February 2001, a large mass grave was found close to Khankala, containing more than fifty dead bodies, many bearing signs of execution. Most of the bodies that were identified belonged to persons who were last seen in the custody of Russian troops or police.

Now, in the seventh year of the armed conflict, many illegal places of detention still exist in the Chechen Republic. Most of them are run by forces operating under Chechen Prime Minister Ramzan Kadyrov (so-called "Kadyrovtsy"). One reason for this parallel penitentiary system is to obtain "confessions" and "testimonies" through cruel beatings and torture, which subsequently can lead to the official detention and persecution of the respective persons. A high number of such criminal cases are fabricated.

Continues....



The Chechen Republic: Consequences of “Chechenization” of the conflict

A report by the Human Rights Center Memorial (September 2005)

Read the complete report

Introduction


A detailed analysis of the situation described in the report by the Human Rights Center “Memorial”, Center “Demos’, International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Norwegian Helsinki Committee «In a Climate of Fear. “Political Process” and Parliamentary Elections in Chechnya»

According to the representatives of Russian authorities, the armed conflict in the Chechen Republic is over, the process of political regulation of the conflict is finished, and the republic has been returned into the legal space of Russian Federation.

In reality, however, behind the façade of “regulation” the armed conflict continues, although its forms have changed. Gross mass violations of human rights continue; these violations are carried out by both sides of the conflict – the armed groups of separatist fighters, and, primarily, by the forces under control of the Russian Federation’s federal center. Over the past few years, the conflict has been “chechenized” – new power structures have been formed, manned by local residents, ethnic Chechens. These structures now have the considerable authority to carry out illegal violence.

Any real political process is impossible under the conditions of continuing state terror. The result is that the Chechen Republic has no political power elected by the population, no power that would be considered legitimate at least by a considerable portion of the population.

Due to the “chechenization” of the conflict, over the last three years the methods and tactics of the power structures have also changed on the territory of the Republic.

Over the years 2003-2005, new power structures made up of ethnic Chechens continued to be formed. Apart from police forces, specialized groups are created for the purpose of fighting the armed separatists. It is to these groups that the “right” to carry out illegal violence is delegated.

The people that the members of these structures get their hands on “disappear” for the rest of the world. They are kept in illegal prisons and are not registered as detained or arrested; they are tortured and thus forced to sign “confessions”, later used to manufacture criminal cases. About half of the kidnapped individuals later disappear without a trace.

At the beginning of the year 2004 a new method is used to force the armed rebels to surrender – their family members are taken hostage or threatened with death.

The number of “cleaning measures” (“zachistka”, when governmental forces raid an area and eliminate or detain all those suspected of supporting the armed rebel fighters) decreased abruptly at the beginning of 2003. However, in August of 2004 it increased again, although it never reached the old level. In 2004 the brutality and mass character of all “cleanings” also decreased. However, the brutality of some of the “cleanings” in 2005 can be compared to those of the first years of the war, and the events in the village of Borozdinovskaya can serve as an example of that.

The problem of “disappearances” of people in Chechnya is still very urgent and serious. In most cases, the “disappeared” individuals have been kidnapped by the members of Russian Federation’s armed forces. The human rights activists do note a certain decrease in the number of registered kidnappings; however, this decrease is not as significant as stated by the official representatives of the government. This “decrease” can be connected in part to the reign of “latent violence” in Chechnya; this violence is registered neither by human rights organizations nor by law enforcement agencies.

Investigation of crimes against the peaceful civilian population in the conflict zone is dominated by selective impunity.

The criminal cases against separatist fighters are investigated and heavy sentences are passed regardless to the gravity of the crime. However, things are very different in cases of crimes committed by representatives of federal or pro-federal forces. The official statistics are falsified. In most cases where the participation of representatives of these departments is suspected, the investigation is stopped “as it is impossible to find the persons to be persecuted”. Only an insignificant minority of cases is brought to court. The overwhelming majority of defendants receive symbolic punishment for serious crimes.

Often the separatist fighters purposely attack civilians or unarmed representatives of state authorities. Some of the groups opposing the federal power use obviously terrorist methods. After the murder of A. Maskhadov, the influence of terrorists and Muslim fundamentalists has increased among the forces opposing the Russian Federation’s power in Chechnya.

[Continues....]


Human rights violations in the Chechen Republic:
the Committee of Ministers’ responsibility vis-à-vis the Assembly’s concerns


A report by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Councli of Europe (PACE) (Doc. 10774)
Read the complete report


Report Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Rapporteur: Mr Rudolf Bindig, Germany, Socialist Group

Summary

The Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights is deeply concerned that a fair number of governments, member states and the Committee of Ministers have failed to address the ongoing serious human rights violations in the Chechen Republic in a regular, serious and intensive manner – despite the fact that such violations still occur on a massive scale in a climate of impunity in the Chechen Republic and, in some cases, in neighbouring regions.

The Committee urges the Committee of Ministers to confront its responsibilities in the face of one of the most serious human rights issues in any of the Council of Europe’s member states. It should relaunch its monitoring of the human rights situation in the Chechen Republic – which has been at a standstill since spring 2004 – and discuss the consequences of Russia’s insufficient co-operation with the Committee for the Prevention of Torture as well as take “specific action” on the 1994 Declaration on compliance with commitments, as requested by the Assembly in 2003. Otherwise, the committee warns, the lack of effective reaction by the Council’s executive body could seriously threaten the credibility of the whole Organisation.


[Continues....]



Chechnya Parliamentary Elections in a Climate of Fear

A report by the International Federation for Human Rights (25 November 2005)

Read the complete report

Introduction



The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), the Human Rights Center ‘Memorial’, The International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF), The Norwegian Helsinki Committee and the Center "Demos" are today publishing the report “In a Climate of Fear: the ‘Political Process’ and the Parliamentary Elections in the Chechen Republic.”

The report refutes claims of the Russian government that the situation in the Chechen Republic has stabilized and returned to peaceful life. There is no authentic conflict resolution. Instead, the policy of the Russian government only intensifies the “Chechen deadlock”. The process leading up to and including parliamentary elections, which will take place in Chechnya on November 27, 2005, represents a cynical and dangerous game, which has contributed to the establishment of a climate of fear.

The first section of the report, “The Essence of the Political Process in Chechnya”, gives an analysis of the dynamics of the “political process in the Chechen Republic” from the Referendum of 2003 to the parliamentary elections of 2005, including the present situation of media and the campaign. The second section, “In a Climate of Fear”, covers activities of the Chechen fighters, as well as activities of federal and local pro-Moscow security agencies such as hostage taking and vendetta through abuse of official power, torture, the fabrication of criminal cases, and abductions.


A Conveyer of Violence - Human rights violations during anti-terrorist operations in the Republic of Ingushetia:
A Leading Force behind Continued Massive Violations in Chechnya

A report by the Human Rights Center Memorial (September 2005)

Read the complete report

Introduction


Abductions continued in the fall of 2005 in Ingushetia; relatives of the abductees turned to human rights center Memorial in Nazran. The majority of the abducted were found find by lawyers within a few days in provisional detention facilities in North Osetia or Ingushetia. Those who had "disappeared" and were subsequently “found" in temporary detention centers had, as a rule, already managed to confess to committing terrorism-related crimes. One person died from his injuries received in detainment. Two abductees disappeared without a trace.

In 2005, judicial decisions on indictments in terrorist activities were made for several cases which Memorial had been tracking since 2004. Evidence of the guilt of the accused comprised, on the whole, their own confessions regarding their criminal acts, which were made during preliminary investigations. According to the testimony of lawyers and the statements of relatives, these people had been cruelly tortured. In addition, Memorial received six statements from the detention locations--from the accused themselves--wherein it was described in detail how the young people were subjected to torture and humiliation until they signed "voluntary confessions".

"Who will I become? How will I live in this country if you sentence me, without evidence of my guilt, to such a long prison term for crimes I did not commit?" asked 27-year-old Magomed Khamkhoev in his closing statement in court. Khamkhoev was sentenced to 10 years--in the opinion of his lawyer Umar Khayauri, chairman of the 21st Century board of lawyers in the Republic of Ingushetia, Khamkhoev was sentenced despite the complete absence of an evidentiary basis for his having committed the crime.

The evidence collected in this report compels us to demand an examination of the activities of law-enforcement agencies and the provisional detention facilities in Ingushetia and Northern Osetia. It is clear that a conveyer of violence has been installed in the North Caucasus which comprises law-enforcement agencies, the special forces, the inoperative office of the public prosecutor, the courts which are incapable of revealing falsification, and even some lawyers. Innocent people are inevitably lost to the machine while the real criminals go unpunished.

Memorial warns that the existing system is incapable of effectively fighting terrorism and will, on the contrary, beget the most monstrous forms of terror.

Memorial does not call into question the necessity of the fight against terror. However, this fight must be conducted in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation and the international obligations of the Russian Federation to observe human rights.

[Continues...]


Russian Federation: Violations continue, no justice in sight.
A briefing paper on human rights violations in the context of the armed conflict in the Chechen Republic

A report by Amnesty International (1 July 2005)
Read the complete report

Introduction

The second armed conflict in the Chechen Republic since the break-up of the Soviet Union has continued for nearly six years. In spite of repeated claims from Russian and Chechen officials that the situation is 'normalizing', there seems to be no end in sight either to the conflict itself or to the accompanying human rights abuses. Clashes between Russian and Chechen security forces and armed opposition groups continue. Such clashes are most frequent in the southern regions of the republic, but also periodically take place in other areas, including the capital, Grozny. The regular aerial and artillery attacks by federal forces which took place in earlier phases of the conflict are now mostly confined to the southern regions of the republic. However, Russian and Chechen security forces are conducting targeted raids in towns and villages across Chechnya, during which serious human rights violations, in particular, "disappearances" are common. Extrajudicial killings, and torture, including rape, and ill-treatment are also reported to take place on a regular basis. Such violations are in breach of the obligations of the Russian Federation under international human rights and humanitarian law to protect the right to life, dignity and security of the person and not to be subjected to torture or other forms of ill-treatment.

[Continues....]



Impunity: A Leading Force behind Continued Massive Violations in Chechnya

A report by the International Helsinki Federation (May 19, 2005)

Read the complete report (in .doc format)

Introduction


The most effective preventive measure against severe human rights abuses is to have all such cases effectively investigated and the perpetrators duly punished in accordance with the law, regardless of their rank and position. For Chechnya, such deterrence would be central as a precondition for both reconciliation and a lasting political settlement.

The reality in the Chechen Republic is the opposite. A systematic look at the situation reveals an overarching climate of impunity. It shows that Chechen and Federal law enforcement authorities remain either unwilling or unable to hold accountable for their actions the vast majority of perpetrators of serious human rights violations, particularly when the perpetrators are members of Federal forces (military servicemen, FSB personnel, Ministry of Interior staff) or of the pro-Moscow Chechen authorities, or armed groups controlled by these authorities. People in Chechnya describe the situation as "worse than a war", referring to the atmosphere of arbitrariness, intimidation, and vulnerability to the ongoing abuses that prevail in the republic. Even in the most well-documented and transparent cases there is, as a rule, no progress in holding responsible the perpetrators. The lack of accountability perpetuates the conflict and contributes to further abuses.

[Continues - in .doc format]

 

Exhumations in Chechnya
Exhumed bodies from mass graves in Chechenya


Chechnya: More of the Same Extrajudicial Killings, Enforced 'Disappearances', Illegal Arrests, Torture

A report by the
International Helsinki Federation (March 30, 2005)

Read the complete report

Introduction

The second Chechen war began over 5 years ago. How does the republic mark this sad date? How do people live and survive in a strange situation of "no peace, no war", under the rule of no law? There are a few signs of peaceful life. Compensations for lost housing are slowly beginning to be paid (on rare occasions, even without kick-back to relevant officials), separate islands of reconstruction are appearing in Grozny, and many cars are visible on the streets. The central open-air market is ever so busy.

But some other things have not changed at all: Abductions and illegal detentions of civilians by unknown armed persons dressed in camouflage are still pervasive. The only difference is that these people now do not arrive exclusively in military vehicles, but in regular cars as well. As a result, murders, torture and beatings have remained unchanged. And the prosecutor's office is still either unwilling or unable to provide effective investigation into those endless cases.

People are afraid. The work of human rights defenders and journalists is further complicated by the civilians' reluctance to communicate with them: "You cannot change anything, you cannot defend us. And we still need to survive here." It is hard to argue with this logic.

It has become regular practice to illegally detain and abduct relatives of armed insurgents. Human rights defenders are trying to draw attention to this problem, but so far they have been unsuccessful. Authorities not only refuse to react to this lawlessness - they are actually trying to make it appear normal. On 29 October 2004, in his address to the Russian State Duma, Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation V.F. Ustinov officially suggested to legalize "counter-taking of hostages" as a method in the fight against terrorism.

Another trait of today's Chechnya is the increasing "Chechenization" of the conflict with various local armed formations being engaged in the "fight against terrorism" along with the multi-thousand Russian forces. These are not only "Kadyrovtsi"[1]  and "Yamadaevtsi"[2] , but also "Baysarovtsi"[3] , "Kakievtsi"[4], etc. Often it is impossible to understand who exactly conducted an operation of detention or abduction. These groups are autonomous (or semi-autonomous), and many of them have their own illegal places of detention, to which the prosecutor's office, of course, has no access. People look for their missing relatives through arranged "black connections". Hence, a time of "legal bandit formations" has come in Chechnya.

What authorities do they work with, are they coordinated among themselves, does their existence promote security in the republic? During a trip to Chechnya in September 2004, an IHF team managed to meet several members of Baysarov's formation located around the 15th milk farm of the Grozny Rural district of Chechnya. Here are excerpts from that conversation:

- Is it true that Ramzan Kadyrov and Movladi Baysarov have had an argument?

- Yes. Ramzan visited Movladi after the death of Akhmad-Khadji Kadyrov and told him to dissolve this unit, to send everyone home. He said: 'After the death of the President you are not part of the presidential Security Service anymore. I don't need your bandits round here.' But Movladi refused to let us go. He said it was out of the question. He told Raman that we would not budge because we killed many Vakhabits  and they will be after us. So, if we return to the villages we'll be killed, one by one. They argued for a long time. And then Ramzan came out to us and said: 'It's OK, boys. Movladi and I have sorted everything out. You just stay where you are and wait. There will be some changes in the enforcement structures and I'll make sure to find a good place for you.' But he has not done this so far. We don't have any official cover yet. And we need it.

- In this case, what power structure do you belong to now?

- We work in close cooperation with our FSB, but we are not officially employed anywhere. Only two persons from our group are listed among the employees of Chechnya's power structures. Length of experience does not matter here. If someone is wounded, he receives no social assistance. If our fighter is killed, his family gets nothing. And our boys die often… We had situations when a fighter went to his home village to see his family and was murdered there by the Vakhabits. Are people afraid of you? (smiling) - It is more like they use us to scare each other. Once I heard a young man tell  another during an argument: "I am from the Baysarov group, we will show you!" I knew that he had no connection to the Baysarov group, and so I asked him why he says such things. And he answered: "Everyone says that you are terrible people."

- When your cars are stopped at check-points, what documents do you show? - No one has dared to stop us so far.

But it is certainly the "Kadyrovtsy," i.e. members of the so-called Security Service of the President of the Chechen Republic headed by the Chechen Vice-Premier Ramzan Kadyrov, son of the late President Akhmad Kadyrov, that are feared the most by Chechnya's civilian population. The recent missions of the IHF researchers to the region clearly demonstrated that as far as Chechen civilians are concerned, today "Kadyrovtsi" are more dangerous to them than federal servicemen. It is worth noting that while some victims and their relatives are willing to elaborated on the violation of their rights by federal servicemen, they are far more reluctant to talk about the crimes of "Kadyrovtsi," lowering their voice to a whisper and trying to avoid any concrete facts. In fact, when the Human Rights Center "Memorial" reports that the number of disappearances decreased by 17% in 2004 if compared to the previous year, the IHF researchers are convinced that one of the possible explanations behind this is that now a great portion of human abductions is perpetrated by "Kadyrovtsy" and in those cases relatives of the victims are afraid to complain due to possible repercussions against themselves or other members of their families.

As far back as on 27 August 2004, the Acting Minister of Internal Affairs, Ruslan Alkhanov, issued an order forbidding representatives of security power structures to carry out special operations on the territory of Chechnya while masked. Speaking on local television, Ruslan Alkhanov said: "From now on, representatives of any power structures who wear masks on the territory of Chechnya will be regarded as criminal elements, and will be subjected to lethal fire. This order has been made clear to all sub-divisions of MIA and other power structures of the republic." [4]

But, as seen in examples below, people in masks are continuing to "watch the order" in the republic, without any fear of punishment. These cases were documented in the course of field missions during the period of November 2004 to January 2005. They are only a part of a bigger and most disturbing picture, a vivid illustration to the pattern of never-ending violation of human rights and humanitarian law in the Chechen Republic, to which the international community fails to provide an adequate response.

--------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Members of the Security Service of the President of the Chechen Republic, headed by Ramzan Kadyrov.
[2] Members of the armed battalion "Vostok", headed by Sulim Yamadaev.
[3] Members of the armed formation, headed by Movladi Baisarov, formerly part of the Security Service of the President of the Chechen Republic.
[4] Members of the armed battalion "Zapad", headed by Said-Magomed Kakiev.
[5] See under http://kavkaz.strana.ru/news/224670.html



Worse Than a War “Disappearances” in Chechnya - a Crime Against Humanity

A Human Rights Watch Briefing Paper

A report by Human Rights Watch (March 2005)

Read the complete report

Executive Summary

Enforced disappearances in Chechnya are so widespread and systematic that they constitute crimes against humanity. Human Rights Watch urges the United Nations Commission on Human Rights to take urgent measures commensurate with the extreme gravity of the phenomenon. It should adopt a resolution condemning enforced disappearances in Chechnya, urging the Russian government to immediately adopt measures to stop the practice and requiring the government to issue an urgent invitation to the Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances.


The conflict in Chechnya, now in its sixth year, is a dire human rights crisis. The Russian government has gone to great lengths to persuade the international community that the situation is steadily “normalizing,” even as in the past year the conflict has shown no sign of abating. Rather, it has increasingly spread to other areas of the Northern Caucasus. Russia contends that its operations in Chechnya are its contribution to the global campaign against terrorism. But the human rights violations Russian forces have committed there, reinforced by the climate of impunity the government has created, have not only brought untold suffering to hundreds of thousands of civilians but also undermined the goal of fighting terrorism.

Chechen fighters have committed unspeakable acts of terrorism in Chechnya and other parts of Russia. Russia’s federal forces, together with pro-Moscow Chechen forces, have also committed numerous crimes against civilians, including extrajudicial executions, torture, arbitrary detention and looting.

But it is their involvement in enforced disappearances that is an enduring feature of the six-year conflict. With between 3,000 and 5,000 “disappeared” since 1999, Russia has the inglorious distinction of being a world leader in enforced disappearances.1 This briefing paper argues that the pattern of enforced disappearances in Chechnya has reached the level of a crime against humanity. It shows that, as part of Russia’s policy of “Chechenization” of the conflict, pro-Moscow Chechen forces have begun to play an increasingly active role in the conflict, gradually replacing federal troops as the main perpetrators of “disappearances” and other human rights violations.2 It reflects forty-three cases of enforced disappearances that occurred in 2004, which Human Rights Watch documented during a two-week research trip to Chechnya in January-February 2005.3 Human Rights Watch has submitted thirty-six of these cases to the Russian government, requesting that it disclose information on the
whereabouts or fate of the “disappeared” individuals and hold the perpetrators responsible.4 We have also submitted the cases to the U.N. Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances, asking that they raise these cases with the Russian government. These cases are appended to this briefing paper.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Estimate by the Memorial human rights center, “Chechnya, 2004: Abductions and ‘Disappearances’ of People,” February 7, 2005 [online], http://www.memo.ru/hr/hotpoints/caucas1/index.htm (retrieved February 25, 2005).

[2] Most of these forces are led by Vice Prime Minister of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov, who is responsible for the republic’s law enforcement structures.

[3] In the course of its research, Human Rights Watch conducted more than sixty interviews with witnesses and victims of abuses in Grozny, Gudermes, Urus-Martan, Argun, Samashki, Sernovodsk, Starye Atagi and many other towns and villages in Chechnya

[4] In the remaining cases, witnesses asked Human Rights Watch not to release any information, since the families are still trying to find their “disappeared” relatives though private channels. In addition to the forty-three cases that occurred in Chechnya in 2004, Human Rights Watch documented one “disappearance” that occurred in December 2003, and two 2004 “disappearances” that took place in Ingushetia. These are not included in the appendix.




Chechnya 2004: “New” Methods of Anti-Terror. Hostage taking and repressive actions against relatives of alleged combatants and terroristshe human rights situation in the Chechen Republic


A report by the Memorial

Read the complete report

FROM THE CONFLICT ZONE
BULLETIN OF HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER “MEMORIAL”

For the Chechen Republic the year 2004 was of special significance for a number of reasons. Firstly, the war spilled over its borders and spread to the neighboring republics, primarily to Ingushetia, Dagestan, North Ossetia and Kabardino-Balkariya. Secondly, it was a year of qualitative change in the methods of the anti-terrorist operation. On the one hand, the process of "Chechenization" has come to its logical completion. On the other hand, in conjunction, with support and under the auspices of the Federal Center, previously individual cases of hostage-taking, destruction of property and other forms of repressive actions against family members of alleged combatants have become systematic.

If previously repressive actions against family members of alleged combatants were either instances of revenge, or attempts to extort information about the fighters from their relatives, now these methods have become a tactic used to exert pressure upon combatants in order to force them to surrender. Thus, the methods of the state, which for over five years now has justified its actions in the Chechen Republic by the necessity to combat terrorism, have finally concurred with the methods of terrorists.

The ensuing thematic bulletin of HRC “Memorial” aims to systematize and analyze available data on these forms of human rights abuse. [Continues...]



The human rights situation in the Chechen Republic


A report by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Councli of Europe (PACE) (Doc. 10283, 20 September 2004)
Read the complete report


Report Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights
Rapporteur: Mr Rudolf Bindig, Germany, Socialist Group


Summary

The human rights situation in the ChechenRepublic remains catastrophic. The report strongly condemns  human rights violations committed by all sides of the conflict, including the recent spate of despicable terrorist attacks against civilian targets, other killings committed by illegal armed formations and the numerous violations of human rights in the form of murder, forced disappearances, torture, hostage-taking, rape and arbitrary detention committed by members of different Federal and regional security forces during their “special” or “targeted” operations in the Chechen Republic and, increasingly, in neighbouring regions. The report concludes that a climate of impunity is still prevailing in the ChechenRepublic due to the fact that the Chechen and Federal law enforcement authorities remain either unwilling or unable to hold accountable for their actions the vast majority of perpetrators of serious human rights violations. The draft resolution and recommendation make concrete
proposals to help solve the human rights crisis and urge in particular

    *      the Government of the Russian Federation to end the climate of impunity in the ChechenRepublic;

    *      the Russian State Duma to set up a Committee of enquiry to investigate the alleged abuses by different branches of the executive, in particular the different law enforcement bodies in the ChechenRepublic and in neighbouring regions;

    *      the Council of Europe’s member states to use every opportunity, in their bilateral and multilateral relations with the Russian Federation, to recall the need to respect human rights also in the fight against terrorism and separatism;

    *      the Committee of Ministers to ensure that the discussion and debate of the human rights crisis in the North Caucasus region of the Russian Federation remains a regular item on the agenda of the Committee of Ministers and Ministers’ Deputies, to ensure that such discussions cover reports and the follow-up of the implementation of recommendations made to the authorities by all bodies and mechanisms of the Council of Europe and to urge the Government of the Russian Federation to put an end to reprisals taken against any person in relation to the filing of an application to the European Court of Human Rights.


The humanitarian situation of the Chechen displaced population

A report by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Councli of Europe (PACE) (Doc. 10282, 20 September 2004)
Read the complete report


Report Committee on Migration, Refugees and Population

Rapporteur: Mr Tadeusz Iwinski, Poland, Socialist Group


Summary

The aim of this report, based on the findings of the visit to the North Caucasus as well as on the information provided by the international and local organisations involved in the humanitarian action in the region, is to examine the situation of Chechen internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees in Chechnya, in other parts of the Russian Federation and in other countries.

According to the Rapporteur, the security and humanitarian situation in the ChechenRepublic remains unsatisfactory. On the other hand, the situation of the Chechen displaced persons in Ingushetia has slightly improved. The Rapporteur welcomes the efforts of the Ingush authorities aimed at the normalisation of living conditions of the displaced population.

The Rapporteur raises the question of insufficient legislative mechanisms and related assistance which would facilitate the settlement of Chechen IDPs in other parts of the Russian Federation. Moreover, the vestiges of propiska (residence permit) seriously hamper the principles of freedom of movement and liberty to choose one’s place of residence within the country.


The political situation in the Chechen Republic: measures to increase democratic stability in accordance with Council of Europe standards


A report by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Councli of Europe (PACE) (Doc. 10276 17 September 2004)
Read the complete report


Report Political Affairs Committee Rapporteur: Mr Andreas Gross, Switzerland, Social Group


Summary

The situation in the Chechen Republic is of great concern to the common values which all member states of the Council of Europe have committed themselves to and thus requires close attention by the authorities of the Russian Federation as well as assistance by the relevant Council of Europe bodies. The absence of the rule of law in Chechnya prevents the development of a humane and democratic society. Democratic institutions will remain hollow and fragile where people live in fear and poverty, organised crime and warlords fighting for quick profits and daily terror costing the lives of many. The Parliamentary Assembly strongly condemns the gross violence which persists in Chechnya and has sadly become the most significant formative factor for a whole generation of people in Chechnya, as well as the spill over of terrorist action towards other federal entities of the Russian Federation neighbouring the Chechen Republic, in particular the most recent tragic hostage-taking at the school
in Beslan (North Ossetia). The Assembly is concerned that the recent wave of terrorist attacks will lead to a further escalation of violence and a deterioration of the human rights situation in the North Caucasus region. There is no alternative to dialogue and negotiation for those who really want to reach peace and reconciliation. This must be possible with those who are ready to renounce the use of violence and weapons.



Chechnya's Suicide Bombers: Desperate, Devout, or Deceived?

A reprot by the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (September 16, 2004)
Read the complete report

Executive Summary

Now in its fifth year, the second Russo-Chechen War has deteriorated into a protracted stalemate where death and despair are the only clear victors. In Chechnya, the conflict has created a cultural and demographic crisis rivaling the tragedies witnessed in Bosnia and Kosovo. Years of war and social upheaval have left the people of Chechnya with nothing but misery. Throughout the second Chechen war, Russian Forces have radicalized the resistance and humiliated the populace by committing widespread human rights abuses against civilians. These actions, combined with the Kremlin’s unwillingness to negotiate with moderate members of the resistance, have continued the Chechen conflict and correspondingly engendered extremist tactics such as suicide terrorism.

Chechen suicide terrorism is an important topic of inquiry for several reasons:
The onset of suicide terrorism tells us something about the state of the present conflict in Chechnya. Religious fundamentalism and Russian cleansing operations are relatively recent developments in the Chechen conflict. Both have a role in explaining suicide terrorism, but the significance of the former is too often overstated while the latter is frequently under appreciated as a motivator of suicide bombing.

Chechen suicide terrorism is a strategic tactic. Engaged in an increasingly
asymmetrical struggle with the Russians, radical factions within Chechnya are seeking any means available to achieve their goals. As this report indicates, these elements have used suicide terrorism as a way to attract support while attempting to coerce Russia into leaving the Chechnya. As such, the implementers of Chechen suicide terrorism are analytically distinguishable from the vast majority of those who actually carry out suicide attacks.


An examination of the psychology, motives, and demographics of individual
suicide bombers provides helpful insights into Chechnya’s war-torn society. In particular, the war in Chechnya has profoundly changed the role of women in Chechnya, and due in large part to this fact, females comprise a shocking majority of Chechen suicide bombers.


Understanding the motives and circumstances of Chechen suicide terrorism
naturally leads to certain conclusions about Russia’s presence in the region. For example, Russia’s brutal prosecution of the war in Chechnya, combined with its unwillingness to negotiate with moderate forces in the Chechen resistance, has spawned and exacerbated suicide terrorism in Chechnya.

Suicide terrorism is one of the least understood aspects of the second Russo-Chechen
war. The most common explanations of Chechen suicide terrorism are either too restricted in their scope or too removed in their perspective. In an effort to provide reliable information, dispel certain myths, and offer much-needed context, the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC) has prepared this study. A number of studies have examined the worldwide proliferation of suicide terrorism on the macro level, but there have been no comprehensive attempts to investigate the specific phenomenon of Chechen suicide bombings. Taking into account individual case profiles, scholarly studies, and empirical analysis, this report seeks to fill that gap.

There are two main
competing theories that attempt to explain why Chechen suicide bombings occur. Focusing upon selected suicide attacks, some observers claim that all Chechen suicide bombings are orchestrated by deranged religious extremists, who blackmail, drug, and coerce young women into committing heinous acts. While still others make the blanket claim that all Chechen suicide bombers carry out attacks autonomously, and are self-actuated by despair alone. This report seeks to dispel both of these myths by showing that there is no axiomatic explanation for Chechen suicide terrorism. The situation is more complex. Since 2000, there have been 23 Chechen related suicide attacks in the Russian Federation, and the profiles of the suicide bombers have varied just as much as the circumstances surrounding the bombings.

However, all this is not to say that certain instructive
patterns are not apparent in the phenomenon of Chechen suicide terrorism. The lowest common denominator shared by all Chechen suicide bombers is the despair and hopelessness spawned by the horrific conditions of the Russo-Chechen war. Most Chechen suicide bombers have lost loved ones in Russian ‘counter-terrorist’ operations or in fighting against Russian forces. Some cases documented in this report indicate that a few of Chechnya’s suicide bombers were recruited by manipulative orchestrators using radical Islamist rhetoric, but even in those instances, unbearable grief and hopeless despair have made the potential bombers (especially women) vulnerable to the advances of suicide terrorism recruiters.

Thus, while there can be no excuse for
the abhorrent terrorist tactic of suicide bombing, Russia ultimately bears responsible for creating the underlying conditions that fuel suicide terrorism in Chechnya. Suicide bombings did not begin until the Second-Russo Chechen war, when Russian forces began systematically targeting Chechen civilians in so-called cleansing operations. If Moscow wants eschew another wave of suicide terrorism, then it must take a close look at the human catastrophe it has wrought in Chechnya. Ultimately, the Kremlin must come to understand that ‘counter-terrorism’ strategies, which employ abduction, torture, and lawless killing, only serve to radicalize the resistance and humiliate the population, thereby creating a fertile breeding ground for more terrorists. By marginalizing moderate voices in the Chechen resistance and denying hope to thousands of Chechen civilians, Russia has needlessly prolonged the war, prompting some to resort to radical measures, including suicide terrorism. In the final analysis, the road to peace in Chechnya and the prescription for stopping suicide terrorism are the same: peaceful reconciliation with moderate representatives of the Chechen leadership and an end to senseless violence against civilians.

Masked man in Chechnya

The Trauma of ongoing War in Chechnya

Quantitative assessment of living conditions, and psychosocial and general health status among war displaced in Chechnya and Ingushetia

A report by the
Doctors Without Borders (August, 2004)
Read the complete report

This report presents the findings of two quantitative surveys conducted by MSF among the displaced populations in Ingushetia and Chechnya to gain information on living conditions and health status.[...] People interviewed had been displaced for at least five years. We found a population living in unacceptable conditions, traumatized by conflict, and in fear of their safety.

Physical and mental health needs were significant, but access to appropriate services is at best problematic.

The authorities are currently undertaking a policy of moving people, against their will, from Ingushet ia to Chechnya, but conditions in both locations are unacceptable and this will do nothing to improve the plight of this vulnerable population.

The authorities must ensure protection and appropriate living circumstances for this displaced population. This will require greater attention from the international community to this conflict that has been largely ignored for the last decade.


Three reports on violations of human rights and humanitarian law in Chechnya and Ingushetia

A report by the International Helsinki Federation (August 4, 2004)

Vienna, 4 August 2004.

Today the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights (IHF) issued three reports about the human rights and humanitarian law situation in Chechnya and Ingushetia, documenting severe human rights violations by Russian and Chechen security forces, which are increasingly spreading across the borders of Chechnya to neighboring Ingushetia.

"Chechnya: Enforced 'Disappearances', Extrajudicial Killings and Unlawful Detentions - An Update" describes seven cases of enforced "disappearances", two cases of torture and extrajudicial killings, one case of extrajudicial killing, one case of killing by torture and six cases of unlawful detentions. In none of the cases were the perpetrators brought to justice so far.

"Ingushetia: Enforced 'Disappearances', Extrajudicial Killings and Unlawful Detentions. December 2003 - June 2004" describes six cases of enforced "disappearances" of Ingush citizens on the territory of Ingushetia, including the 'disappearance' on 11 March 2004 of Rashid Ozdoev, an Ingush Deputy Prosecutor, who was responsible for investigating unlawful activities of security force structures, and who repeatedly made written and oral protests requiring FSB officials in the Ingush Republic to stop violating the law.

"The Situation of IDPs in Ingushetia after the Armed Incursion of 21/22 June 2004" deals with the series of so-called special operations by police and military agencies throughout Ingushetia, following the armed incursion in Ingushetia on 21/22 June 2004, and their effects on the situation of Chechen IDPs in Ingushetia. These operations included ID controls, interrogations, fingerprinting, as well as searches of individual houses. Particularly many of the temporary settlements for Chechen IDPs were targeted. While most of the operations were conducted in a more or less correct manner, some were marred by irregularities, obviously intended to intimidate IDPs in order to pressure them to return to Chechnya. One operation, in Altievo on 23 June 2004 was conducted as a mop-up operation ('zachistka'), involving numerous severe human rights violations. Approximately 2.500 of the 50.000 IDPs who were still present in Ingushetia, left for Chechnya in the three weeks after the armed raid.

For more information: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, Henriette Schroeder, Press Officer, Tel. +43-676-725 4829 Moscow Helsinki Group, Tanya Lokshina, Programs Director, Tel. +7-916-624 1906

The reports are available on the IHF website under www.ihf-hr.org (at the moment only in English).



"Normalization" in whose eyes?

A report by the Amnesty International (June 23, 2004)
Read the complete report

AI INDEX: EUR 46/027/2004    Russian Federation: Chechen Republic

Introduction

The second armed conflict in the Chechen Republic since the break-up of the Soviet Union has continued for nearly five years. In spite of repeated claims from Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen officials that the situation is 'normalizing', there seems to be no end in sight either to the conflict itself or to the accompanying human rights abuses. Although the regular aerial and artillery attacks which took place in earlier phases of the conflict are now intermittent, and raids on villages which where large in scale in previous years are now targeted and take place at night, Russian and Chechen security forces continue to carry out human rights violations with impunity. These include extrajudicial killings, "disappearances" and torture, including rape, and ill-treatment; such violations are in breach of the obligations of the Russian Federation under international human rights and humanitarian law to protect the right to life, dignity and security of the person and not to be subjected to
torture or other forms of ill-treatment. In addition, Chechen armed opposition groups target civilian members of the Chechen administration and are suspected of being responsible for a number of bombings, which have caused indiscriminate harm to civilians. Such violations and abuses, many of which constitute war crimes, are overwhelmingly committed with impunity, as very few perpetrators are ever identified and brought to justice. The "normalization" is characterized by the lack of respect for the rule of law and security of the individual.

Human rights abuses which previously occurred almost exclusively in Chechnya are increasingly spreading across the border to neighbouring Ingushetia. While Ingushetia enjoyed the reputation as a safe haven for displaced Chechens during the first years of the war, this is no longer the case. During the first few months of 2004, there appeared to be an increase in the number of "disappearances" and killings in Ingushetia, and affecting Chechen as well as Ingush people.

At the time of writing the last remaining tent camp in Ingushetia for internally displaced persons (IDPs) from the Chechen Republic, Satsita, was about to be closed down in early June. Four others were shut down in the previous six months. IDPs from these camps have been subjected to unacceptable levels of pressure from federal as well as local authorities to return to the Chechen Republic. Many have refused to go back, citing the security situation as their main concern. Others have felt that there was no alternative and have returned to an uncertain future. Now, after the closure of the tent camps, the question is whether the authorities will apply more pressure on the tens of thousands of Chechens who remain in spontaneous settlements or private accommodation in Ingushetia, to go back to Chechnya.

Photo caption: Two boys play in the ruins of the former tent camp for IDPs, Sputnik. © AI

This report is based on the findings of an Amnesty International delegation which travelled to Ingushetia in March/April 2004 as well as ongoing research conducted from Amnesty International's International Secretariat in London. During the field research, Amnesty International delegates interviewed a substantial number of victims of human rights abuses as well as their relatives and also met with lawyers and representatives of local and international organizations working in the region, including the Memorial Human Rights Centre, the Society of Russian-Chechen Friendship, the Danish Refugee Council, the Chechnya Justice Initiative and Niizo. The aim was to gather information about the human rights situation inside the Chechen Republic as well as in Ingushetia.

The delegates visited Ingushetia at a time when the situation in the republic is becoming increasingly tense. While the security situation in the Chechen Republic remains more precarious than in Ingushetia, the rising number of human rights abuses in a republic which, until two years ago, was considered relatively stable, warrants an inclusion of Ingushetia in this report. It is not only a place where Chechen IDPs have sought refuge, it is a republic where the cycle of violence and abuse which exists in Chechnya is now being repeated.

Amnesty International also continuous to be greatly concerned about the ongoing cycle of human rights abuses – committed with impunity – in the Chechen Republic, as well as the lack of investigations into past violations.
 

Russia - Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

Russian soldiers in Grozny

A report by the U.S. Department of State (february 25, 2004)
Read the complete report

Excerpt from the introduction

Although the Government generally respected the human rights of its citizens in some areas, its human rights record worsened in a few areas. The Government's record remained poor in the continuing struggle with separatists in Chechnya, where federal security forces demonstrated little respect for basic human rights. There were credible reports of serious violations, including numerous reports of unlawful killings, and of abuse of civilians by both the Government and Chechen fighters in the Chechen conflict. There were reports of both government and rebel involvement in politically motivated disappearances in Chechnya. Parliamentary elections held on December 7 failed to meet international standards, although the voting process was technically well run. Criminal charges and threats of arrest or actual arrest against major financial supporters of opposition parties, and seizure of party materials from opposition parties, undermined the parties' ability to compete.

There were credible reports that law enforcement personnel frequently engaged in torture, violence, and other brutal or humiliating treatment and often did so with impunity. Hazing in the armed forces remained a problem. Prison conditions continued to be extremely harsh and frequently life-threatening. Arbitrary arrest and lengthy pretrial detention, while significantly reduced by a new Code of Criminal Procedure, remained problems, as did police corruption. Although there were some improvements, assessments of the progress made in implementing the significant reforms in criminal procedures code enacted in 2002 were mixed at year's end. Government protection for judges from threats by organized criminal defendants was inadequate, and a series of alleged espionage cases continued during the year and caused continued concerns regarding the lack of due process and the influence of the FSB in court cases. Authorities continued to infringe on citizens' privacy rights.

Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional media outlets; this resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television station; however, a wide variety of views continued to be expressed in the press. Authorities, primarily at the local level, restricted freedom of assembly and imposed restrictions on some religious groups. Societal discrimination, harassment, and violence against members of some religious minorities remained problems. Local governments restricted citizens' freedom of movement, primarily by denying legal resident permits to new residents from other areas of the country. Government institutions intended to protect human rights were relatively weak but remained active and public. The Government placed restrictions on the activities of both nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and international organizations in Chechnya. Ethnic minorities, including Roma and persons from the Caucasus and Central Asia, faced widespread governmental and societal discrimination, and, at times, violence. There were increasing limits on workers' rights, and instances of forced labor and child labor were reported. Trafficking in persons, particularly women and girls, was a serious problem.



Rough Justice: The law and human rights in the Russian federation

A report by Amnesty International (october 2003)
Read the complete report

Since its birth in 1991, the Russian Federation has introduced substantial reforms to its legal system. This report charts the history of the justice system, assesses the impact of international human rights instruments on it, and evaluates how legal reforms have been implemented. Although the law has extended its reach in the Russian Federation, it still offers little protection to many people. This Amnesty International report highlights four areas where the law is failing to provide justice:

This report is published as part of a major worldwide campaign against human rights abuses in the Russian Federation, Justice for everybody, launched in October 2002. The campaign seeks to highlight the discrepancy between the human rights protection people in the Russian Federation have in law, and the reality of continuing and widespread abuses.

Introduction

The Russian Federation’s transition towards a market economy from one based on “administrative commands” has been visible to anyone visiting the country since it became a sovereign state in December 1991. Less visible has been the tortuous change to its system of justice. This began in August 1991, when Boris Yeltsin – then President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) – banned Communist Party organizations in the courts and all other workplaces.

<>This report, written in April 2003 – some 12 years since the Russian Federation began to make fundamental changes to its system of government – focuses on the legal changes. Through information drawn from more than 20 regions, much collected firsthand on research visits and during trial observations, the report examines how far the reforms made so far have given people a quick, fair and effective remedy when they have been wronged.[51] Two wars in the Chechen Republic (Chechnya) have blackened the Russian Federation’s first years as a sovereign state, with gross abuses of human rights committed by government forces and Chechen fighters. Government forces have so far been prosecuted for these crimes in very few cases, and then after long delays. The wars have also highlighted the institutional flaws that impede people’s full enjoyment of their human rights in the 88 other constituent parts (Subjects) of the world’s largest state.[52] Some groups – such as children born with mental disability and prisoners – are particularly vulnerable to abuses of their rights. Almost none of the institutions described in this report exist in Chechnya. People living there have no clemency commission, no regional parliamentary ombudsman and, between late 1999 and late 2001, they had no courts. Reforms under the new Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) will not reach them before 2007. The authorities in the Russian Federation are obliged to ensure that everyone has effective protection against violations of their human rights. In light of the country’s recent human rights record, it is particularly important that people are protected from torture, unfair trials, the death penalty, unlawful killings, arbitrary detention and discrimination, and that everyone has access to effective remedies if their rights are violated. It is also important that no one should be returned to a country where they would be at risk of torture, execution or unfair trial.

RUSSIA - Spreading Despair: Russian Abuses in Ingushetia

A report by Human Rights Watch - (September 2003, Vol.15, No. 8(D))

Read the complete report

Executive summary

The brutality of the four-year armed conflict in Chechnya has started spilling across the border to the neighboring republic of Ingushetia.[50]

In the summer of 2003, Russian forces based in Chechnya and the forces of the pro-Moscow Chechen administration conducted a series of operations in Ingushetia, in which they replicated many of the same abuses as those they committed during operations in Chechnya. Alerted to these developments, Human Rights Watch conducted a research mission to Ingushetia from July 5 to 11, 2003. Through interviews with more than forty victims, witnesses, and government officials, we documented the abuses committed by federal and local military, security, and police forces on the territory of Ingushetia in June and early July 2003.

Until recently, Ingushetia remained a relatively safe refuge for tens of thousands internally displaced persons who had fled the fighting in Chechnya. In 2002, claiming the situation in Chechnya had “normalized,” Russian authorities started pressuring internally displaced persons living in Ingushetia to return home. Federal and local migration officials employed various methods to pressure displaced persons to go back—they threatened displaced Chechens with the imminent closure of tent camps in the middle of winter; removed hundreds of people from the camp registration lists effectively denying them aid and causing them to be evicted. Additionally, they blocked the construction of alternative shelters in Ingushetia. In addition, officials threatened the displaced people with arrests on false charges such as drugs and weapons possession, and impending sweeps in Ingushetia. These threats were realized in the summer of 2003, when Russian authorities finally resorted to what many displaced persons believe to be the most effective means of forcing them back to Chechnya—making Ingushetia an equally perilous place.

In June 2003, Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces conducted at least five security operations in settlements for Chechen displaced persons in Ingushetia and two in Ingush villages close to the border with Chechnya. The operations involved numerous cases of arbitrary arrest and detention, ill-treatment, and looting. In addition, Russian forces appeared to be responsible for killing one Ingush civilian and seriously wounding another. In a separate incident, a Russian soldier shot and wounded a sixteen-year-old boy. Similar to the governmental response to abuses committed in Chechnya, authorities failed to diligently investigate the violations and hold perpetrators accountable. The deteriorating security situation in Ingushetia has marked a new stage in the campaign to compel internally displaced people to return to Chechnya. It has been coupled with new official commitments by the federal government to compensate returning Chechens for their destroyed homes and a new deadline for the closure of tent camps in Ingushetia.

Federal and pro-Moscow Chechen authorities have said that the displaced should be back in Chechnya by the beginning of October, when that republic’s presidential elections are scheduled to take place. This particular combination of threats and incentives has proved to be more effective than previous efforts—reportedly, hundreds of people have returned to Chechnya in recent months. Meanwhile, the situation in Chechnya remains precarious for civilians. Both Russian forces and Chechen rebels continue to commit serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law. Against the backdrop of the forthcoming presidential elections in Chechnya, violence there has escalated, with daily large-scale clashes resulting in numerous deaths on both sides, and continued abuses against civilians.

By harassing the internally displaced through abusive raids in Ingushetia and pressuring them to return to the conflict zone, Russia is violating international standards for the protection of civilians, including those reflected in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. Human Rights Watch calls on the Russian government to immediately halt abusive operations in Ingushetia, fully investigate all allegations of human rights and humanitarian law violations, and bring to justice perpetrators of serious violations. The government should cease pressuring internally displaced persons to return to Chechnya and ensure that they continue to enjoy protection and humanitarian assistance in accordance with international law. In addition the government should extend internally displaced persons’ status to those who wish to leave the conflict zone. Human Rights Watch also urges the relevant international agencies involved in the region to protest any actions that may endanger the lives and well-being of thousands of internally displaced people residing in Ingushetia.

Dead russian soldiers in Chechnya
Dead Russian soldiers

Deceptive Justice

A report by
Memorial - (Updated in May 2003)

Situation on the investigation on crimes against civilians committed by members of the Federal Forces in the Chechen Republic during military operations 1999–2003.
Read the complete report
(.pdf format)

Introduction

The stabilization of the situation in Chechnya and the establishing of normal relations between the population and the representatives of the Federal Authorities can not be possible without a serious and objective investigation on the various crimes committed against the civilian population of the republic by servicemen, members of both the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the special services.

In March 2000 during the meeting with both the PACE delegation (Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe) and the Russian State Duma, V.V.Ustinov, the Procurator-General of Russia, assured the European deputies that “no violation of Law and no violation of Human Rights will happen without an investigation from the Russian office of public prosecutor”. He underlined that as far as the members of the office of public prosecutor were concerned, “there is no difference on who violates the law, whether civilians, or servicemen”.

Within three years, in February 2003, president V.V.Putin declared that in Chechnya, a system of police, courts and office of public prosecutor is well established and “we will not cover those who committed crimes in the Chechen Republic, including servicemen of the Russian Army”. The officials of the RF usually provide statistics as a proof of the authenticity of such assertions: – The number of criminal cases concerning crimes against civilians, committed in Chechnya by servicemen or policemen. – The number of servicemen or policemen that were condemned for having committed crimes against local inhabitants.

However, these figures alone do not mean a lot. The number of criminal cases must be compared with the real number of crimes committed by members of the federal forces. It is more important to know the number of criminal cases that have been investigated into, what were these crimes, on which stage the investigation of the most important crimes is carried out, i.e mass violation of Human Rights during “mopping up” operations, kidnapping people, torture and killings of the detained local inhabitant etc. In order to estimate the efficiency of the work done by organs of investigation, we must take into account what were these sentences passed by the courts, and on which crimes had they been passed.

The Human Rights Center “Memorial” aimed at permanently following the real development of the investigation on crimes committed against civilians, prisoners, workers in medical institution etc, by both sides of the conflict during the armed conflict in the Chechen Republic. This report was made by the Human Rights Center “Memorial”, it is based on a correspondence with the office of public prosecutor, on documents sent by the Russian party to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, on documents published by the Media, and on documents from the Human Rights Center “Memorial” monitoring. This report deals with the situation in May 2003. In the beginning of June, according to the Main Military Prosecutor’s Office, the number of criminal cases brought against servicemen slightly increased, martial courts condemned two more servicemen. This fact does not change the global situation and does not affect the report’s conclusion.

Human Rights Situation in Chechnya

A report by Human Rights Watch - (April 7, 2003)

[From a HRW Briefing Paper to the 59th Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights]
Read the complete report

Introduction

Last year, as Russian troops in Chechnya were committing hundreds of forced disappearances, extrajudicial executions, and widespread acts of torture and ill-treatment, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights rejected a resolution that would have expressed concern about the Chechnya conflict. The Russian government interpreted the resolution's failure as a signal that the international community now endorsed its actions in Chechnya, and refused to implement the key elements of the resolutions the Commission adopted in 2000 and 2001.[38]

Today, with the Commission in its 59th session, the human rights situation in Chechnya remains abysmal. The March 23, 2003 referendum-hailed by the Russian government as a major step toward peace and cautiously endorsed by the international community-cannot obscure Chechnya's harsh realities.[39] The armed conflict in Chechnya continues and humanitarian law violations appear to be increasing. Human Rights Watch research conducted in the region in late March found that Russian troops had "disappeared" at least twenty-six people between late December and late February, or roughly three people per week. This is the highest rate of "disappearances" Human Rights Watch has documented since the beginning of the conflict. In more than fifty interviews with victims and eyewitnesses, we also documented new cases of extrajudicial execution, torture and ill-treatment, and arbitrary detention. The Russian government's long-standing failure to investigate diligently such abuses and prosecute their perpetrators remains unchanged. Chechen rebels are believed to be responsible for a continuing pattern of assassinations of village administrators and other civil servants working for the pro-Moscow government in Chechnya. This briefing paper summarizes these findings, and describes government efforts to compel internally displaced people living in Ingushetia to return to Chechnya, despite the life-threatening conditions civilians face there.

Unpublished government statistics confirm the high risk of abuse civilians face in Chechnya. According to an unpublished report on criminal activity in Chechnya, in 2002 1,132 civilians were killed, or between five and eight times the murder rate for Russia, and between ten and fifteen times the murder rate for Moscow.[40] A second unpublished report, providing crime statistics for the first months of 2003, stated that for January and February there were seventy murders, 126 abductions, and twenty-five cases in which human corpses were found. Accompanying the statistics were detailed descriptions of more than 185 crimes in Chechnya committed in January and February 2003; in many, federal forces are implicated.

Throughout the past year, the Russian government sought to limit the flow of information from Chechnya. It barred outside scrutiny of the conflict by refusing to renew the mandate of the OSCE Assistance Group to Chechnya, forcing its closure, and by refusing to arrange visits to the region by several U.N. special mechanisms. The government also denied Human Rights Watch access to the region for the tenth time since the outbreak of the conflict in 1999. Finally, the government harassed several Chechen human rights advocates, one of whom subsequently "disappeared" after being taken into custody.

Human Rights Watch urges the Commission to adopt a resolution on the Chechnya conflict, calling on Russia to issue invitations to the relevant thematic mechanisms, to agree to renew the mandate of the OSCE Assistance Group, and to invigorate the domestic accountability process. A Commission resolution should deplore continued abuses, and should note in particular the failure by Russia to establish a national commission of inquiry, as required by previous resolutions, and an official public record of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed in the conflict. It should also call on the Russian government to refrain from pressuring displaced people to return to Chechnya.



The human rights situation in the Chechen Republic

From a report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights - Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
Rapporteur: Mr Rudolf Bindig, Germany, Socialist Group - Doc. 9732 (13 March 2003)
Read the complete report

Summary

The Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights believes that there cannot be peace without justice in the Chechen Republic. The human rights situation in the Republic is the key to an equitable political solution based on national reconciliation. The human rights situation in the Chechen Republic is characterised by gross human rights abuses, violations of international humanitarian law and war crimes, committed by both sides to the conflict. So far, everyone involved – the Russian government, administration and judicial system, the different Chechen regimes – has failed dismally to provide adequate protection from human rights abuses. Even the influence and co-operation of international organisations and their member states have not managed to ensure that the victims of these abuses were granted redress, nationally or internationally. The result is a climate of impunity which encourages further human rights violations and which denies justice to thousands of victims. If a meaningful political process is to develop in the Republic, human rights violations must stop and those responsible for past abuses must be brought to justice. The Assembly should thus recommend that a variety of measures be taken by the relevant actors in the Chechen Republic, the Russian Federation and the international community to improve the human rights situation in the Chechen Republic without further delay.


UNHCR Paper on Asylum Seekers from the Russian Federation in the context of the situation in Chechnya

From a report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees - (February 2003)
Read the complete report (.pdf format)

Introduction

1. This paper is an update of the previous .UNHCR Guidelines on Asylum- Seekers from Chechnya,. of January 2001.
While the general principles as stated in the previous guidelines remain valid, given the ongoing conflict in the Chechen Republic (Chechnya[41]) over the last two years and the number of individuals seeking international protection on grounds related to the current situation in Chechnya, the need has arisen for more detailed information concerning 1) the question of internal relocation, and 2) the identification of categories of persons who may be in need of international protection.

I. General situation and recent developments

2. UNHCR has not established a presence inside Chechnya but rather receives information from a variety of sources with a presence in Chechnya. These sources are consistent in reporting widespread and serious violations of human rights and humanitarian law within Chechnya.

3. Abdul-Khakim Sultygov, President Putin.s human rights envoy for Chechnya confirmed that 284 people disappeared in the war-torn region between January and August 2002. He also said that efforts to end abuses against Chechen civilians by the Russian military had failed and new regulations were being prepared.[42]

4. According to the Council of Europe's experts' assessment of December 2002: "the security situation has clearly worsened since the hostage taking in Moscow in late October 2002. The experts could witness that military movements within the Chechen Republic have remained intensive."[43]

3. At the beginning of November 2002, Russian forces carried out an intensive campaign against separatists throughout the territory of Chechnya. Russian Defence Minister Sergey Ivanov announced that previous plans to reduce military presence in Chechnya had been suspended.[44]

[Introduction continues...]



Tent camps in Ingushetia are dismantled with force pressuring Chechen refugees to return.

Chechen refugees tent camp - Ingushetia
Refugees in former tent camps in Ingushetia

Russian officials shut down almost all refugee camps in Ingushetia. Thousands of refugees living in tents in Ingushetia have been pressured to return against their will to other refugee-style camps in Chechnya. The authorities had pressured refugees to leave by destroying the tents they live in or cutting off water, electricity and gas supplies or menacing Chechen men with arrest or worse (an imitation of the "clean-up" operations that plague Chechnya are rising in Ingushetia too - many have already been abducted and their whereabouts remains unknown). Meanwhile thousands have been struck off from the official aid lists, the humanitarian ration their lives depends on. Finally most camps have been closed and thousands were sent home to Chechnya. Despite the horrible material conditions of Chechnya (most of those returning will not find intact and warm houses waiting for them) and the lack of any basic guarantee for the protection of civilians from abuses, these refugees are pushed back into the Chechen territory. This forced return is a push that ostensibly intends to support the Kremlin's claim that the four-year Chechen war is over and an attempt to get rid of the public embarrassment of refugees living in tents on Russian soil. According to, Eliza Musayeva, chairwoman Memorial's office, "through the liquidation of refugee camps the Russian leadership is trying to remove the evidence that the situation in Chechnya is far from normal". Officially the refugees from Ingushetia will be resettled only on a voluntary basis and many were accommodated in private houses, but the Memorial human rights group said the move is reminiscent of Stalin-era mass deportations. More details in this report and recent press releases.

Continues --->>>

Donate